The problem
"The most valuable data cannot be shared like ordinary data." DECK
Bio datasets, private benchmarks, reward functions, source accounts, and proprietary tests all have value because they can evaluate something. Direct disclosure destroys that leverage. DECK
Data owners
Need proof of utility without handing over the data. DECK
Optimizers
Need reward signals, but raw reward data can leak the verifier. DECK
Buyers
Need trust that the evaluation actually ran — not a PDF promise. DECK
What is it
"Interaction with private data is not the same as disclosure." — the team's thesis. DECK
"Private data can become verified reward without becoming public data." A TEE holds the private verifier, runs measured code, and exposes only budgeted rewards, bands, hashes, attestations, and settlement events. On the poster it is framed as one interface with two sides: data holders seal private material; researchers fund a capped evaluation and receive a bounded result. DECK POSTER
What it does
"The same primitive opens several high-value use cases." DECK
Bio validation
Private reward over assays, single-cell data, QC, hidden holdouts. DECK
Private benchmarks
Evaluate code or models against proprietary tests without releasing the tests. DECK
Diligence rooms
Price research, datasets, SOPs, bug reports, and model artifacts. DECK
Source custody
Browser-held accounts and private sources become sealed assets. DECK
Multi-owner science
Fan-out gates, consent, reviewer holds, joint attestations. DECK
How it works
Seal the data, run measured code inside the boundary, release only a bounded transcript.
Sealed inputs
Security claim: "Only the chosen reward transcript leaves the TEE." The team bounds what a public transcript can reveal as I(D ; transcript) ≤ n·k + b — n reward queries × k visible bits + b final-result bits. DECK
Built with: TEE / CVM (Phala deployment runbooks) · TDX / DCAP attestation · Base Sepolia contracts · Foundry · Tinker (RL / test-time training) · the team's "NDAI Agreements" model. DECK REGISTRY Repo not public — confirm
The numbers
The team's own figures, as stated in the deck.
Who's building it
Built by Wiktoria Leks; recorded in the cohort as a 3-person team, Bay Area / Texas. REGISTRY WEB
Wiktoria Leks
Bioinformatics researcher. Co-author on the GEDI cell-death biosensor paper — "Genetically encoded cell-death indicators (GEDI)…," Linsley et al., Nature Communications, 2021. Presents as "Wiki" / Victoria.
The team of record
The registry lists WikiGen as a 3-person team (Bay / TX). It also associates Jonny Johnson (Topos, dialogues.ai) with the team — a separate strand who pitched his own product at the July mock. Full roster and roles are unconfirmed for this page.
Traction
What exists now — research lineage, a live surface, and shipped components.
Research lineage
The founder is a published co-author on the GEDI cell-death biosensor (Nature Communications, 2021). WEB
Live surface
wikigen.me resolves — "Attested Diligence Rooms. Bring the evaluator to the data." WEB Live · 07-22
Shipped, per the deck
DiligenceRoom escrow + settlement tests, EmailOracleAuth policy + tests, and a TEE email-oracle service with a sealed store are marked "real"; a Tinker-delegate control plane + billing scaffold is "partial." DECK
In their own words
The deck's opening line, then three excerpts from the founder's July mock-pitch. In that session Jonny presented a separate Topos product; the lines below are Victoria's ("Wiki"), the WikiGen strand.
"Private data can become verified reward without becoming public data." Deck cover line DECK
"So many people have sensitive data about the ecosystem I'm in, and they want a shared query — to use it for good. So why not create a system where people can collaborate and have trust verified?"
"Before exposing what we're searching, we verify: are we doing the science? Can we do the science?"
"I'm launching a B2B2C infrastructure for all the in-betweens — so the data owner or the requester doesn't have to do the trust work themselves."
"Inside the TEE / CVM: decrypt · evaluate · score · decide. Outside the boundary: only proof."
See it & links
"Help us make private rewards verifiable public infrastructure." DECK
| Surface | Where | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Website | wikigen.me — "Attested Diligence Rooms. Bring the evaluator to the data." | WEB Live · 07-22 |
| Arena | wikigen.me/arena — the poster's "bio challenge arena" is a modeled preview; the live path currently shows only the landing page (checked 07-22) | POSTER WEB Preview — confirm |
| GitHub | No public repo is linked on the poster, deck, or registry. The deck cites deployed Base Sepolia contracts and 39 Foundry tests, but nothing public was found to verify them (checked 07-22) | WEB DECK Conflict — confirm |
| Alt (Topos) | topos.dialogues.ai — the registry's alternate link; the separate Topos strand. Live 07-22 | REGISTRY Confirm relationship |
| Demo | A Google Drive file listed in the registry; not opened for this page | REGISTRY Access unconfirmed |
| X | x.com/wikigen is reported but unconfirmed as this team's (the registry lists none; the handle returns only a generic shell) | REGISTRY Unverified |
| Contact | Via wikigen.me — no email is printed on the poster or deck | POSTER |
Provenance ledger
Every load-bearing claim and where it comes from; decisions live in §11.
| Claim | Comes from | Tier | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem framing, thesis, applications, security claim | Private-reward pitch deck + cohort poster, July 2026 | DECK POSTER | Team's own artifacts |
| Two-sided marketplace, sealed boundary, "only proof leaves" | Poster center panel | POSTER | Team's own artifact |
| Leakage bound I ≤ n·k + b; 39 Foundry tests; Base Sepolia contracts | Deck (security claim, project progress) | DECK | Pending approval |
| Public repo with deployed contracts + tests | Deck claims it; no repo is linked or found (07-22) | DECK WEB | Conflict — confirm |
| Live-arena competition figures (2.40 ETH, running challenge) | Poster arena — self-labeled "modeled competition preview," illustrative until deployed | POSTER | Modeled preview |
| Founder: Wiktoria Leks, GEDI biosensor co-author (Nat. Comms. 2021) | Cohort registry; corroborated on the Nature Communications author list | REGISTRY WEB | Verified live |
| 3-person team, Bay / TX; Jonny Johnson / Topos associated | team_profiles.csv, people.csv, TEAMS_MEMORY | REGISTRY | Confirm roster |
| Registry traction note: "Caltech / ex-Facebook on team" | Registry record only; not independently verified; may be cross-referenced from another team | REGISTRY | Unconfirmed — kept off cards |
| wikigen.me live; "Attested Diligence Rooms" / "Bring the evaluator to the data" | www.wikigen.me, fetched 2026-07-22 (matches the poster tagline) | WEB | Live · 07-22 |
| Pitch excerpts (§08) | Mock Demo Day, 2026-07-17 (Victoria / "Wiki"); lightly punctuated | PITCH | Pending approval |
Founder review
Five things before this page goes public.